Sorry to Disillusion You Who are Over From Intfiction

But I wasn’t planning on doing serious or a series of reviews of IFComp entries. I was only remarking on one that I played and found particularly interesting.*

One exciting thing I did learn, however, is that the Interactive Fiction community is just as wonky and fragmented as the rest of gamerdom. I learned many cool things, in fact.

1) There is a schism in the community about what IF is; there are Parser Purist and there are those who think that any and all text-based stuff counts as IF.

2) Much like some people gripe and complain about games being developed on this engine or that engine, people in the IF community seem to be grumbly about games developed in things besides Inform & TAD(both parser based dev platforms), particularly something called Twine, which sounds like it eats christian babies if some parser-Grognards are to be believed.

3) The debate between parser based games and CYOA/Hyperlinked games is pretty heated and involves some hurt feeling. Some people are going so far as to suggesting 1-starring any entries that aren’t parse based in their competition, while other people are saying that’s incredibly misogynistic and transphobic.

Wait, what? Am I missing something here? Oh, right! Niches, niche programming, niche development, learning curves, silenced voices, etc. etc. etc.

Unless they’re really well put together (and even then, it can be iffy), parser games are incredibly difficult to play. There’s not only an incredibly steep learning curve to play them, there’s also a steep learning curve to develop ones that aren’t crappy unplayable messes.

Choose Your Own Adventure style html based programming has apparently become more popular in the Interactive Fiction community if for no other reason than developing this sort of game is easier and has less learning curve. Hell, I developed my “Game” in MS Word, because after one look at Inform I was all “No time for this right now”. Anyway, accessibility has led to two things: a change in ratio of choice-based interactive fiction vs. parser-based interactive fiction, and an increase in ‘marginalized developers’ who want their voices heard.

Pretend I said “marginalized developers” in regular quotes. Then pretend I said it again with finger quotes. Who are marginalized developers? Developers who haven’t learned to develop except in user friendly software. Developers who are LGBT and/or minority.

So, there’s the complaint that X is not Y. Indeed X is not Y, but the fact that you are complaining is because you hate gay people and other minorities. Wait, what?

Apparently, Zoe Quinn, a figure who interestingly most of the IF community doesn’t seem to have heard of, and #gamergate cast their shadows here, too, because since Zoe’s game was a choice based IF title and Zoe is being persecuted, then your dislike of a certain game type is dislike of Zoe and all marginalized individuals? I don’t know! But maybe!

It interests me when I hear about marginalized voices in gaming, and often times these voices become marginalized because they don’t go into development. Now that they are in development using a simple to use dev tool, people who did not like that game style in the first place now do not like gay people/women either because I guess gay people/women are the ones using more?

Are LGBT underrepresented in parser-based text gaming? Are they underrepresented to a greater degree than they are overrepresented in other media? Everyone crapped themselves when it came out that most people’s impression of the percentage of LGBT people in America was wildly overestimated. So, is it possible that parser-based gaming is so incredibly niche a development field, and the LGBT dev community so small that a random sampling might just happen to include next to no LGBT devs? I don’t know, nor do I know if it matters.

Based on a few of the games I played in IFComp, I can see why some people might complain. A few of the games felt less like games (some didn’t even really have choices that I could perceive) than they did Dorothy Allison prose-poetry where you clicked a hyperlink to go to the next paragraph. Is it interactive fiction? Well, it’s fiction that you can interact with, but I can see how finding multiple examples of that when someone was really hoping for a Zork-fest one might find it aggravating.

In the meantime, I’m now facing Stereotype Threat. Why? Because Oh, Crap, I’m a minority, and I’m writing my choice-based Interactive fiction in a word-processor! Is it because I’m Latino? Is it because I have gender dysphoria? Is it because I smoked too much dope in college listened to industrial music? Or is it because that was the platform that I wanted to create in? I don’t blame somebody who wants to play Zork for not wanting to read what I wrote, and I think it has more to do with them wishing it was Zork rather than because I’m whatever niche ethno-gender identity.

This is probably bad to say, since I’m so “new” to the Interactive Fiction community, but after one quick peek under the hood, I’m sticking with my D&D homies.

But if any of you who came over on the forum sandwich feel like staying, by all means stay, and I hope you enjoy what you find here.

*: I won’t tell you which ones I played, but seriously, Creatures Such as We was the only one I liked; what does that say about me, since it was choice-based and not parser, but also not html-links?


After some time to think about things… (some swearing)

So, like the one thing that no one is talking about with the Zoe Quinn thing is what this says to female game developers about how to get noticed.

There are a lot of shitty people involved in this whole thing, and just because some of those shitty people are gross sexists doesn’t make Zoe Quinn not a shitty person. Just because her ex-boyfriend (also shitty) is the sort of psycho who’d publicly air all of the dirty laundry about his failed relationship doesn’t make Zoe Quinn or the industry people she was sleeping with not shitty people.  Even KNOWING about it makes me feel like a shitty person.  The people hailing Zoe as some martyred saint are less shitty than the people sending threats, but they’re still shitty if they don’t point out what a terrible thing for women in gaming that has been uncovered by the whole disgusting thing.

Sexual quid pro quo in any industry is NOT A GOOD THING. The fact is, male gaming journalists may have given preferential treatment and coverage to a female developer because of sexual relationships with her or the prospect of sexual relationships with her. What does that say to female indie developers who are trying to make a name for themselves in a highly competitive industry that is, as we’re so often reminded, male dominated and male targeted? If you have sex with men they will like you and say nice things about you and your game.

Zoe Quinn is NOT the only woman in gaming, but if you’ve read any articles about her, you’d think that she was the most important woman in gaming until she was destroyed by a roving army of misogynists. Frankly, I had never heard of her until after dozens of blogs and gaming news sites had rushed to her defense (and their own, by proxy). I keep seeing all of these comparisons between Zoe & Anita Sarkeesian. The difference in my mind is that Anita Sarkeesian is only guilty of putting out a lazy product with work she took from other people while being hella slow to release content that her investors paid for ages ago (though in fairness, no one ever to my knowledge threatened to rape James Maliziziziziwhatever when Dwimmermount tanked).  To my knowledge, she’s not been actively involved in dangerous or corrupt behavior to the detriment of other women in the industry.  What disturbs me most about Zoe’s alleged actions is the game jam that she was raising funds for, along with the help of several sites and individuals she had relationships with, professional or otherwise, directing traffic that way, that looks as though was never going to happen in the first place.

I’d say that my hope is that someday gaming journalism will not be so corrupt that reviews and content plugs are based on who is sleeping with who, but I know that will never happen. Especially considering the number of non-gaming journalists who are LITERALLY in bed with staffers, bureaucrats, chairs, politicians, etc. and the revolving door for politicos who land cushy jobs as correspondents at news networks and vice-versa.

Lastly, I’d like to throw in this comment from cephalopodlovesong out there, because it’s so spot on

one of the huge problems this “culture” has is taking the experiences of one person and expanding them to the entire gender.

“Zoe Quinn cheated on her boyfriend, but claims she’s a feminist/sjw. ALL WOMEN WHO IDENTIFY AS FEMINISTS/SJWS ARE TERRIBLE PEOPLE. OMG LOOK AT THIS.”

“Anita Sarkeesian is not as well educated on games as she could be and makes some sweeping generalizations under the guise of ‘research’. ALL WOMEN ARE DUMB CUNTS WHO WANT TO RUIN OUR GAMES.”

if people were able to say “wow, this is a sort of shitty thing that this one person did. I’m personally not going to support that person anymore, but realize that one person’s behaviors are not the behaviors of an entire group of people.” I feel like this wouldn’t be as bad. however, all the fucking doxxing to get people’s information is RIDICULOUS.